9060xt 16gb vs 5060ti 16gb

[vitiellofrancesco318@gmai]

hello I have to match one of these cards with a 5800x3d what is my advice for better performance? .9060xt 16gb 390€ 5060ti16b 410€

I have a 1080p monitor at 144hz

 

[Dr. Dro]

The 5060 Ti is better, and for 20 euros between them, it's a no brainer in my opinion as you get access to things like DLSS 4. According to W1zz's review, without RT taken into consideration it is a smidge faster than the best 9060 XT model across all resolutions, so that's what I'd pick between these two at the prices given. If you can find a cheaper 9060 XT, for like 370 euros, then I'd buy that instead. But with 20 bucks between them, the 5060 Ti is the better option - better upscaling, better RT, and slightly lower power consumption as well.

Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT Nitro+ OC Review - The Fastest RX 9060 XT

The Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT Nitro+ OC stands out with a large factory overclock, making it the fastest card tested today. Its cooling solution is equally remarkable, achieving virtually inaudible noise levels even under full gaming load, and temperatures are still excellent.

www.techpowerup.com

 

[Macro Device]

If you can find a cheaper 9060 XT, for like 370 euros, then I'd buy that instead.

Even at 370, it's not great because Blackwell cards might be all sorts of wrong but they overclock a lot better than anything we've seen lately. Overclocked 5060 Ti leaves 9060 XT noticeably behind.

 

[Marcus L]

hello I have to match one of these cards with a 5800x3d what is my advice for better performance? .9060xt 16gb 390€ 5060ti16b 410€

I have a 1080p monitor at 144hz

Both roughly the same performance wise, pick whichever one you prefer

Even at 370, it's not great because Blackwell cards might be all sorts of wrong but they overclock a lot better than anything we've seen lately. Overclocked 5060 Ti leaves 9060 XT noticeably behind.

Well the reviews from TPU for both show's roughly a 10% performance increase on both GPU's, though @W1zzard reviews don't really delve into OC all that just a small segment and Timespy run, would be good to see some game metrics when overclocking even if just a few. Not sure how other sites have reviewed them regarding OC so you could be right but tbh the difference is still going to be negligible so I would still advise the OP just to pick his preferred GPU out of them.

Would have helped if you specified which models of each GPU you are considering as that could also play a factor in your decison making @vitiellofrancesco318@gmai and the rest of your system specs

 

[oxrufiioxo]

I'd take the 5060ti 16GB at that price difference for sure.

The only aib I'd avoid for now is gigabyte due to the pos thermal paste or whatever they used instead of pads. The only other consideration is if your mobo is pcie 3.0 but currently the 16GB 5060ti performs just fine unlike it's 8GB counterpart.

 

[W1zzard]

The 5060 Ti is better, and for 20 euros between them, it's a no brainer in my opinion

+1 on that

 

[Denver]

Both have very close performance, depending on the selection of games one can excel or not, AMD runs much better games like COD and Nvidia in Stalker for example, but I would say to buy the cheaper one.

I have my doubts about how the two will perform on an AM4 PCie 4.0 platform and which will have less driver overhead to push the 144fps you expect.

 

[thestryker6]

Is the motherboard PCIe 4.0 or PCIe 3.0?

If it's PCIe 3.0 then the 9060 XT is the way I'd go.

 

[Macro Device]

If it's PCIe 3.0 then the 9060 XT is the way I'd go.

Minimum FPS at 4K tells it's not relevant:

which will have less driver overhead to push the 144fps you expect.

It's virtually the same these days. NV did have a driver overhead problem a year or two back but they fixed it.

 

[_roman_]

i saw some charts today on techspot for that pcie 3.0 vs 16GB for that amd grpahic card. Most likely from hardware unboxed.

I assume the user most likely is a windows user and therefore Nvidia would be the obvious choice.

Personally I would grab a amd graphic card in the higher segment. 400€ is a bad price segment for what you get.

 

[Marcus L]

Minimum FPS at 4K tells it's not relevant:
View attachment 404581

It's virtually the same these days. NV did have a driver overhead problem a year or two back but they fixed it.

Did you miss the point he said he plays at 1080p/144? a 5060 Ti/9060 XT are not 4K cards and will be GPU limited in every scenario at 4k, under 1080p however that is not the case, where's the 1080p results from the same thread?

 

[Macro Device]

he plays at 1080p/144?

Don't matter.

5060 Ti/9060 XT are not 4K cards

Don't matter.

Why? Because in games of today, at 1080p it's no more than 6 percent discrepancy between 5.0 and 3.0 (and the OP might have a 4.0 board which makes it <1% perf loss) and it only loses in games where it woulda lost to an AMD card anyway. Also because game system requirements don't stand still, 'pecially when the new generation consoles are getting so close to be released. Today's 4K is tomorrow's 1440p and next week's 1080p.

This 5% loss is de facto impossible to tell in a blind test. In the games of tomorrow, there will be no such loss as you'll run of GPU speed way before that.

Why do I still recommend a 5060 Ti over a 9060 XT despite them being effectively the same performance GPUs? Because the list of games where FSR4 is present is obscenely short. Even if we include FSR3.1 titles, it's still A LOT worse than DLSS4 availability. I don't talk frame gen, I talk actual upscaling. And because RDNA4 handles VRAM leaks worse and it shows in Spider-Man 2 for example where 5060 Ti beats 9060 XT exactly because the latter runs out of memory despite having equal amounts of VRAM.

 

[Marcus L]

Don't matter.

Don't matter.

Why? Because in games of today, at 1080p it's no more than 6 percent discrepancy between 5.0 and 3.0 (and the OP might have a 4.0 board which makes it <1% perf loss) and it only loses in games where it woulda lost to an AMD card anyway. Also because game system requirements don't stand still, 'pecially when the new generation consoles are getting so close to be released. Today's 4K is tomorrow's 1440p and next week's 1080p.

This 5% loss is de facto impossible to tell in a blind test. In the games of tomorrow, there will be no such loss as you'll run of GPU speed way before that.

Why do I still recommend a 5060 Ti over a 9060 XT despite them being effectively the same performance GPUs? Because the list of games where FSR4 is present is obscenely short. Even if we include FSR3.1 titles, it's still A LOT worse than DLSS4 availability. I don't talk frame gen, I talk actual upscaling. And because RDNA4 handles VRAM leaks worse and it shows in Spider-Man 2 for example where 5060 Ti beats 9060 XT exactly because the latter runs out of memory despite having equal amounts of VRAM.

What are you talking about? literally cherry picked 1 game and you failed at the point you were trying to make, there is practically 0-5% difference between both cards at 1080p, your bias is showing yet again, I didn't even recommend the AMD GPU to the OP and just said they are within spitting distance of each other in most scenarios and yet here you are making shit up

Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT Nitro+ OC Review - The Fastest RX 9060 XT

The Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT Nitro+ OC stands out with a large factory overclock, making it the fastest card tested today. Its cooling solution is equally remarkable, achieving virtually inaudible noise levels even under full gaming load, and temperatures are still excellent.

www.techpowerup.com

 

[lexluthermiester]

5060ti16b 410€

The 5060 Ti is better, and for 20 euros between them, it's a no brainer in my opinion as you get access to things like DLSS 4.

I'll second this. The 5060ti is a solid value at that price.

 

[eidairaman1]

How many of these threads are you going to make?

 

[lexluthermiester]

How many of these threads are you going to make?

They're trying to sort through a complicated market. Remember, most people are not like ultra tech fluent like us. They need help sorting things out. Let's be nice.

 

[eidairaman1]

I presume by your email address you are out of spain, so anyways...

They're trying to sort through a complicated market. Remember, most people are not like ultra tech fluent like us. They need help sorting things out. Let's be nice.

He can use an existing thread of his

 

[Hecate91]

i saw some charts today on techspot for that pcie 3.0 vs 16GB for that amd grpahic card. Most likely from hardware unboxed.

I assume the user most likely is a windows user and therefore Nvidia would be the obvious choice.

Personally I would grab a amd graphic card in the higher segment. 400€ is a bad price segment for what you get.

Yes, this one.

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT PCIe Benchmark: 8GB vs. 16GB

The 8GB RX 9060 XT looks like a solid budget GPU - until you actually game on it. Limited VRAM turns it into a performance liability, especially...

www.techspot.com

I really would've liked to see a test at 1080P, but regardless there is a difference when using pci-e 3.0 or 4.0. I personally wouldn't pay 400euro for a x60 class card, and AMD cards have lower driver overhead which will help with a 5800X3D.

 

[lexluthermiester]

He can use an existing thread of his

There's no harm in it either. No forum rules are being violated. So if you don't like the additional thread, don't look at it. They're not trolling, they're asking for insight. There's no need to be unpleasant to new/inexperienced users looking for help.

 

[Denver]

Minimum FPS at 4K tells it's not relevant:
View attachment 404581

It's virtually the same these days. NV did have a driver overhead problem a year or two back but they fixed it.

There is a significant performance loss in some games. If the OP is using an older platform, it's best to avoid the 5060 Ti.

 

[Marcus L]

There is a significant performance loss in some games. If the OP is using an older platform, it's best to avoid the 5060 Ti.

View attachment 404593View attachment 404592

You're not allowed to have that opinion about Nvidia GPU's on TPU, minus 10 points credit score

 

[Dr. Dro]

You're not allowed to have that opinion about Nvidia GPU's on TPU, minus 10 points credit score

OP has a 5800X3D... all likelihood is that they have PCIe 4.0 support regardless. Storm in a teacup.

 

[lexluthermiester]

There is a significant performance loss in some games. If the OP is using an older platform, it's best to avoid the 5060 Ti.

View attachment 404593View attachment 404592

Interesting cherry picking. Neither of those graphs show that the 5060ti would not be a good choice.

 

[Marcus L]

Interesting cherry picking. Neither of those graphs show that the 5060ti would not be a good choice.

Both a solid choice no? can you let the words pass your lips??

 

[ShrimpBrime]

Both a solid choice no? can you let the words pass your lips??

No, that is not how it works.

The Performance difference looks like in excess of 30% and the price difference is less than that.

So you buy the 5060 ti for 20 bucks more and just have a faster gaming card.