Monday, May 5th 2025

More Owners of Premium GIGABYTE GeForce RTX Cards Report Thermal Gel Slippage

Last week, GIGABYTE issued an official response to an initial case of "thermal conductive gel slippage," involving an ultra-expensive AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 MASTER ICE, a vertical-mounted graphics card setup, and very non-intensive MMO gaming sessions. The Taiwanese manufacturer believes that this problem is isolated within a first wave of products: "every graphics card is inspected and verified against our quality standards before leaving the factory. The thermal conductive gel is an insulating, deformable, putty-like compound. It is engineered to remain in place when applied properly, and can endure at least 150 °C before any melting or liquification could happen. In some early production batches for the GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 50 Series, a slightly higher volume of gel was applied to ensure sufficient thermal coverage. The overapplication may cause the excessive gel to appear more prominent, extended, and could potentially be separated from the designated area. While the appearance of extra gel might be concerning, this cosmetic variance does not affect the card's performance, reliability, or lifespan. We had already inspected the issue, and adjusted the gel to the optimal amount in (subsequent) production runs."

Despite sending out a public assurance to a worried audience—"(we) take your concerns seriously and want to provide clear information"—GIGABYTE will not be recalling problematic products. VideoCardz reckons that the company is "downplaying" current conditions. Based on further evidence—shared by several members of the TechPowerUp forum (commenting on news coverage)—unfortunately, the first reported case (emerging from South Korea) was not an isolated incident. Given the contents of GIGABYTE's public bulletin, they seem to be aware that this special thermal material (reserved for fancier SKUs) is troubling owners of early batch "GeForce RTX 50 Series and Radeon RX 9000 Series graphics cards." TPU forumite, remekra, shared two images and the following bit of feedback (plus a warning): "I have mine mounted in Lian Li SUP01 case, so GPU is basically standing that's why it drips into the direction of ports. So far it does not overheat on memory modules. I will hold off sending it to GIGABYTE customer service, as I don't have good memories of them; so until it overheats or stops working I will use it. But if you have a vertical case or stand then be aware."

GIGABYTE's (claimed) laborious QA process points to solid footing: "the thermal conductivity gel solution on the GIGABYTE graphics cards has undergone rigorous testing to verify the performance and stability, including but not limited to: multi-axis drops and vibration testing (covering four corners and six sides). Long‐duration heavy‐load operational simulations, meanwhile, the exposure to extreme ambient temperatures. Verification in both vertical and horizontal installation orientations." In another reply, TaLL—a brand-new TPU community member—disclosed problems arising shortly after purchase: "I just bought a Gigabyte graphics card about two weeks ago. One week shipping process, and then this past week using the GeForce RTX 5080. I am just now learning of this leaking problem, so I checked under the heatsink, and BOOM; some blob is oozing out. I am very worried about this, for obvious reasons.... about 1500+ reasons. These things cost so much, and to use the card for about a week then get gel leaking out...I have a vertical mounted Lian Li case with a riser cable...First time using GIGABYTE as well, and this makes me never want to have any other product from them."

vermie22—another fresh sign-up—shared their personal observation: "same appears to be happening to mine, and it doesn't even appear to be melted at all, just completely slipping out of position. In my case, the thermal pad still seems to be holding its original shape, (but) it seems to have just completely slid down and has barely deformed at all." We hope that GIGABYTE's slight adjustment of applied measures of thermal conductive gel has resolved these issues, going forward. In the interim, affected end users will need to keep a careful eye on their early batch units.
Sources: TechPowerUp Forum #1, TechPowerUp Forum #2, VideoCardz, TechPowerUp Forum #3
Add your own comment

29 Comments on More Owners of Premium GIGABYTE GeForce RTX Cards Report Thermal Gel Slippage

#26
realfifty
I agree with you on that I have a 5090 masterice from April 1st and one from mid April i have poked the gel it seams good but I still wanna see how they are gonna handle it. When one of you get your card back you should loan it to gamersnexus so they can examine the fix
Posted on Reply
#27
vermie22
I contacted Gigabyte again this morning to get some actual information on what was done to my card yesterday, and this was their reply:



The photos they mention just depict a monitor showing the results of a 20 run 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark and a Time Spy run. No photos of the actual card or repairs that were done. No proof that those results were for my card and not a different card. I guess I will have to just trust that those were actual benchmarks made using my GPU.

I am also very curious how they "reapplied" the termal gel, as photos have shown how messy that gel is when you remove the heatsink from the PCB. It would mean that they would have had to reapply all the gel , othwise they would introduce pockets of air and just make a big mess otherwise.

I will provide photos as best as possible when I get the card back.

I now have a delima as I am not confident that the manually reapplied gel will be anywhere neare as effective as the factory applied gel, and I am thinking that the same problem will just end up happenning again.

I am seriously considering buying a new case so I can mount the card horizontally, instead of vertically, but that is just extra cost and effort on my end to mitigate the problem going forward.

What a mess.
Posted on Reply
#28
remekra
vermie22I contacted Gigabyte again this morning to get some actual information on what was done to my card yesterday, and this was their reply:



The photos they mention just depict a monitor showing the results of a 20 run 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark and a Time Spy run. No photos of the actual card or repairs that were done. No proof that those results were for my card and not a different card. I guess I will have to just trust that those were actual benchmarks made using my GPU.

I am also very curious how they "reapplied" the termal gel, as photos have shown how messy that gel is when you remove the heatsink from the PCB. It would mean that they would have had to reapply all the gel , othwise they would introduce pockets of air and just make a big mess otherwise.

I will provide photos as best as possible when I get the card back.

I now have a delima as I am not confident that the manually reapplied gel will be anywhere neare as effective as the factory applied gel, and I am thinking that the same problem will just end up happenning again.

I am seriously considering buying a new case so I can mount the card horizontally, instead of vertically, but that is just extra cost and effort on my end to mitigate the problem going forward.

What a mess.
First they claimed its only cosmetic which was proven false. Now as I feared they will just reapply it.
I would not change the case. I would stress test it for long, long time to accelerate the eventual spill and then contact them again this time demanding refund.
That's what I will do if they will do the same in my case.

Or maybe it will work fine after the reapply but somehow I doubt that it will not happen again.
Posted on Reply
#29
BoggledBeagle
vermie22I contacted Gigabyte again this morning to get some actual information on what was done to my card yesterday, and this was their reply:



The photos they mention just depict a monitor showing the results of a 20 run 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark and a Time Spy run. No photos of the actual card or repairs that were done. No proof that those results were for my card and not a different card. I guess I will have to just trust that those were actual benchmarks made using my GPU.

I am also very curious how they "reapplied" the termal gel, as photos have shown how messy that gel is when you remove the heatsink from the PCB. It would mean that they would have had to reapply all the gel , othwise they would introduce pockets of air and just make a big mess otherwise.

I will provide photos as best as possible when I get the card back.

I now have a delima as I am not confident that the manually reapplied gel will be anywhere neare as effective as the factory applied gel, and I am thinking that the same problem will just end up happenning again.

I am seriously considering buying a new case so I can mount the card horizontally, instead of vertically, but that is just extra cost and effort on my end to mitigate the problem going forward.

What a mess.
I tried to tell you that you should wait.

If they already use the different (better) gel in factory, it may not yet reached all the repair facilities worldwide. They may have just instructed the repair facilities what gel to buy, not really strictly controlling if they really comply and use the right stuff.

The later, the better chance that you will avoid the introductory mess/errors.

I tried to concentrate the discussion about this problem in this thread, I wonder if you could post your finding about the repaired card there, once you receive it?

[EMBED content="thread-336461"]https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/gigabyte-graphic-cards-tim-gel-slippage-problem.336461/[/EMBED]
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 28th, 2025 02:32 +03 change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts

OSZAR »