Monday, May 5th 2025

More Owners of Premium GIGABYTE GeForce RTX Cards Report Thermal Gel Slippage

Last week, GIGABYTE issued an official response to an initial case of "thermal conductive gel slippage," involving an ultra-expensive AORUS GeForce RTX 5080 MASTER ICE, a vertical-mounted graphics card setup, and very non-intensive MMO gaming sessions. The Taiwanese manufacturer believes that this problem is isolated within a first wave of products: "every graphics card is inspected and verified against our quality standards before leaving the factory. The thermal conductive gel is an insulating, deformable, putty-like compound. It is engineered to remain in place when applied properly, and can endure at least 150 °C before any melting or liquification could happen. In some early production batches for the GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 50 Series, a slightly higher volume of gel was applied to ensure sufficient thermal coverage. The overapplication may cause the excessive gel to appear more prominent, extended, and could potentially be separated from the designated area. While the appearance of extra gel might be concerning, this cosmetic variance does not affect the card's performance, reliability, or lifespan. We had already inspected the issue, and adjusted the gel to the optimal amount in (subsequent) production runs."

Despite sending out a public assurance to a worried audience—"(we) take your concerns seriously and want to provide clear information"—GIGABYTE will not be recalling problematic products. VideoCardz reckons that the company is "downplaying" current conditions. Based on further evidence—shared by several members of the TechPowerUp forum (commenting on news coverage)—unfortunately, the first reported case (emerging from South Korea) was not an isolated incident. Given the contents of GIGABYTE's public bulletin, they seem to be aware that this special thermal material (reserved for fancier SKUs) is troubling owners of early batch "GeForce RTX 50 Series and Radeon RX 9000 Series graphics cards." TPU forumite, remekra, shared two images and the following bit of feedback (plus a warning): "I have mine mounted in Lian Li SUP01 case, so GPU is basically standing that's why it drips into the direction of ports. So far it does not overheat on memory modules. I will hold off sending it to GIGABYTE customer service, as I don't have good memories of them; so until it overheats or stops working I will use it. But if you have a vertical case or stand then be aware."

GIGABYTE's (claimed) laborious QA process points to solid footing: "the thermal conductivity gel solution on the GIGABYTE graphics cards has undergone rigorous testing to verify the performance and stability, including but not limited to: multi-axis drops and vibration testing (covering four corners and six sides). Long‐duration heavy‐load operational simulations, meanwhile, the exposure to extreme ambient temperatures. Verification in both vertical and horizontal installation orientations." In another reply, TaLL—a brand-new TPU community member—disclosed problems arising shortly after purchase: "I just bought a Gigabyte graphics card about two weeks ago. One week shipping process, and then this past week using the GeForce RTX 5080. I am just now learning of this leaking problem, so I checked under the heatsink, and BOOM; some blob is oozing out. I am very worried about this, for obvious reasons.... about 1500+ reasons. These things cost so much, and to use the card for about a week then get gel leaking out...I have a vertical mounted Lian Li case with a riser cable...First time using GIGABYTE as well, and this makes me never want to have any other product from them."

vermie22—another fresh sign-up—shared their personal observation: "same appears to be happening to mine, and it doesn't even appear to be melted at all, just completely slipping out of position. In my case, the thermal pad still seems to be holding its original shape, (but) it seems to have just completely slid down and has barely deformed at all." We hope that GIGABYTE's slight adjustment of applied measures of thermal conductive gel has resolved these issues, going forward. In the interim, affected end users will need to keep a careful eye on their early batch units.
Sources: TechPowerUp Forum #1, TechPowerUp Forum #2, VideoCardz, TechPowerUp Forum #3
Add your own comment

29 Comments on More Owners of Premium GIGABYTE GeForce RTX Cards Report Thermal Gel Slippage

#1
Chaitanya
Not a surprise of electronics manufacturer dropping the ball hard.
Posted on Reply
#2
_roman_
Not the first and not the last bad gigabyte product. The medium quality is well known for gigabyte.

I highly doubt.
It is engineered to remain in place when applied properly, and can endure at least 150 °C before any melting or liquification could happen.
I advise Gigabyte to buy external engineering knowledge from certain thermal paste, putty and liquid metal manufacturers. I'll not tell which company i think about who manufactures some product themselves.

That is a reason to try to get a refund for that graphic card, regardless of the brand. Especially with the warranty terms to not open or modify a graphic card in the first place. A graphic card needs to be perfect over the hole warranty period with such usual restricted warranty terms. That looks over 1 cm outside of the plastic shroud.

Posted on Reply
#3
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
_roman_Not the first and not the last bad gigabyte product. The poor quality is well known for gigabyte.

I highly doubt.


I advise Gigabyte to buy external engineering knowledge from certain thermal paste, putty and liquid metal manufacturers. I'll not tell which company i think about who manufactures some product themselves.

That is a reason to try to get a refund for that graphic card, regardless of the brand. Especially with the warranty terms to not open or modify a graphic card in the first place. A graphic card needs to be perfect over the hole warranty period with such usual restricted warranty terms. That looks over 1 cm outside of the plastic shroud.

Fixed it for you.

They could hire proper qa which is the fix.
Posted on Reply
#4
inquisitor1
its why I give a FULL year for anything new released before buying. its just in beta phase till then. and we have seen this more and more by mfr whos qc is terrible but prioritize releasing the product then repairing as needed. scymbag move by gigabutt. good to know.
Posted on Reply
#5
vermie22
Updated photo clearly shows ram chip is barely covered.
Posted on Reply
#6
wolf32v
I guess they did not test them with a VGA riser case side mount. I bet allot of these are VGA side mounted and the heat sink stuff is getting hot and moving because of gravity. I got one of these 5090 Gigabyte Master loved the card design and the trick LCD screen. But had to send it back because the coil whine was really bad. It also had small amounts of heat sink material in places it should have not been on the outside heat sink fins. Almost like it was opened up at the factory and redone but the tech did not clean it up because it appeared factory seal like it never been used.
Posted on Reply
#7
Shakallia
2025 quality control : "Its shitty, but not enough, so we'll keep selling it"
Posted on Reply
#8
_roman_
inquisitor1its why I give a FULL year for anything new released before buying.
I think its two years these days. Most stuff happens much later. Asus has shown me I should have bought something else or waited at least 2.5 years for my x670 mainboard.
I also think about bad SAMSUNG, WD SSDs. And some bad mainboards.

--

#6 was obvious. But very nice to finally see proof.
Posted on Reply
#9
inquisitor1
it said 5080...didnt that just come out?
_roman_asus, bad SAMSUNG, WD SSDs
they are on my do not buy list for YEARS now.
Posted on Reply
#10
BoggledBeagle
I think there should be one thread for Gigabyte video card TIM slippage - preferably in Videocards part of the forum.

I already have one thread, but it has different topic - It is concerned with too little gel being applied.

Perhaps a moderator could make one thread and join the two news threads in it? And then just point to this one thread in all the upcoming news articles coming about this topic???

It feels there will be a lot more articles about this problem.
Posted on Reply
#11
remekra
My card is on it's way to the service as I have RMAed it as advised by Gigabyte.
Here is the better picture after I have taken it out of the case:



You can clearly see that there is nothing on that one VRAM module. I'm surprised that the card worked at all.
It raises even better question. How Nvidia reports GDDR7 temps? I have Gskill Wigidash to monitor the temps and freq. It uses HWInfo API and the temp never exceeded 80C on GDDR7.

Also it doesn't seem like it's just because of excees amount of thermal gel. If it was only excees should flow out, while the rest should be kept in place by the heatsink.
So I'm not really sure how RMA will go. If they will only reapply it, then it will probably just flow out again after some time.
Posted on Reply
#12
freeagent
Just slapped it together with no love.
Posted on Reply
#13
BoggledBeagle
BoggledBeagleI think there should be one thread for Gigabyte video card TIM slippage - preferably in Videocards part of the forum.

Perhaps a moderator could make one thread and join the two news threads in it? And then just point to this one thread in all the upcoming news articles coming about this topic???

It feels there will be a lot more articles about this problem.
I already made the thread:

[EMBED content="thread-336461"]https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/gigabyte-graphic-cards-tim-gel-slippage-problem.336461/[/EMBED]

But have no powers to move anything in it.
Posted on Reply
#14
realfifty
remekraMy card is on it's way to the service as I have RMAed it as advised by Gigabyte.
Here is the better picture after I have taken it out of the case:



You can clearly see that there is nothing on that one VRAM module. I'm surprised that the card worked at all.
It raises even better question. How Nvidia reports GDDR7 temps? I have Gskill Wigidash to monitor the temps and freq. It uses HWInfo API and the temp never exceeded 80C on GDDR7.

Also it doesn't seem like it's just because of excees amount of thermal gel. If it was only excees should flow out, while the rest should be kept in place by the heatsink.
So I'm not really sure how RMA will go. If they will only reapply it, then it will probably just flow out again after some time.
Any update on this? I've heard they're just refunding, is this true
Posted on Reply
#15
remekra
realfiftyAny update on this? I've heard they're just refunding, is this true
No update on this. I just know that it arrived at service because of shipping number tracking.

Where did you heard that they are refunding?
Posted on Reply
#16
realfifty
remekraNo update on this. I just know that it arrived at service because of shipping number tracking.

Where did you heard that they are refunding?
Reddit but I don't trust it that's why I was seeing what you would say
Posted on Reply
#17
remekra
Yeah, once I get any info or update I will post it. But nothing so far.
Posted on Reply
#19
vermie22
remekraMy card is on it's way to the service as I have RMAed it as advised by Gigabyte.
Here is the better picture after I have taken it out of the case:



You can clearly see that there is nothing on that one VRAM module. I'm surprised that the card worked at all.
It raises even better question. How Nvidia reports GDDR7 temps? I have Gskill Wigidash to monitor the temps and freq. It uses HWInfo API and the temp never exceeded 80C on GDDR7.

Also it doesn't seem like it's just because of excees amount of thermal gel. If it was only excees should flow out, while the rest should be kept in place by the heatsink.
So I'm not really sure how RMA will go. If they will only reapply it, then it will probably just flow out again after some time.
I was not running any monitoring software on mine, but the weekend of May 3rd, I was seeing random DirectX 12 crashes, reported as the seemingly catch all Event ID 153 nvlddmkm in Windows Event Viewer. I orginally thought these crashes were due to driver issues, but now I am not so sure.

Anyways, I reached out to my local RMA office requesting an update and received a reply that stated the typical response takes 7 to 14 business days due to high volume. However, they stated that they did put a note on my reqeust to prioritize it. We shall see if that makes any difference or not.
Posted on Reply
#20
remekra
vermie22I was not running any monitoring software on mine, but the weekend of May 3rd, I was seeing random DirectX 12 crashes, reported as the seemingly catch all Event ID 153 nvlddmkm in Windows Event Viewer. I orginally thought these crashes were due to driver issues, but now I am not so sure.

Anyways, I reached out to my local RMA office requesting an update and received a reply that stated the typical response takes 7 to 14 business days due to high volume. However, they stated that they did put a note on my reqeust to prioritize it. We shall see if that makes any difference or not.
When I created RMA request on the retailer website I added all the links to news outlets about this, letting them know that it's my card in them. Also attached a screenshot from Gigabyte Esupport website. In hopes that it will not take them 1 month to finish RMA process, whatever their solution might be.

I have send the card on 6th of May, so far no info but there was weekend in the way and it took at least one day for the card to arrive at the service so for now I don't expect any reply from them yet.
Posted on Reply
#21
vermie22
Just got a response that my RMA request was completed and they sent me a tracking number. No other information on whether they repaired my card with new thermal paste, or if they are sending me a replacement, or they did nothing?
Posted on Reply
#23
remekra
vermie22Just got a response that my RMA request was completed and they sent me a tracking number. No other information on whether they repaired my card with new thermal paste, or if they are sending me a replacement, or they did nothing?
If mine will arrive with just changed thermal gel, I expect a full explanation on how this thermal gel is different than the last one so that it will not spill this time.

I will post that response everywhere I can.
If this is their fix to just reapply it then they need to provide a reason why it will be different this time.
Posted on Reply
#24
realfifty
Apparently the old gel was a bad mix, i guess we will see how old was your card?
Posted on Reply
#25
remekra
Saying that it was a bad mix but now it's a good one is not enough IMO.
Mine was oldest possible from first week of 2025.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 21st, 2025 08:34 +03 change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts

OSZAR »